About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Ideological Collaborator with Enemy

"Expressions "collaborator with enemy" and “ideological enemy” are not very common in a “politically correct” vocabulary currently used in the United States. Anyone pointing out at "collaborators with enemy" and/or  “ideological enemies” takes a great deal of risk to be accused in “neo-McCarthyism” and all other “deadly” “politically incorrect” sins. However, the Nation does have a true ideological opponent. It is Islamic jihad with sword and related to it Ideology of Terrorism." Continued...
 

Barbara Walters, ABC anchor
_____________________

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Barbara Walters: Syrian Dictator 'Charming,' 'Intelligent'
______________________

Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Make this war real in the public arena

"To regain the initiative we've lost, we need to make this war real in the public arena by looking at the complex makeup of the enemies and the simplicity of their objectives. The conflict will not go away because we have tired of talking about it."
 



The Struggle for Civilization
By Jack Lott

The "War on Terror" is over, even as combat with terrorists continues. Like the "Wars" on Drugs and Poverty, it lingers on the back pages and the TV equivalent, the highbrow channels like Discovery and History. Meanwhile, the Department of Defense quietly gears up for the "long war" that is essential to countering the enemy.  The gulf between public perception and the grim reality couldn't be greater or more important to bridge. Public boredom with the combat should not displace the importance of understanding and dealing with conflict within the Muslim world. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spread Islam throughout the world

"Stealth jihadists are working energetically to wear away the very fabric of American culture, with the avowed goal of imposing Sharia here. It doesn’t take much imagination to realize that an America in which Sharia supremacists succeeded in their goal of making Islamic law as the supreme law of the land would look very different from the America of today -- to say nothing of the America of the Founding Fathers. The Second Amendment, of course, would be out the window: only Muslims could bear arms, not non-Muslim subjugated peoples."


The Second Amendment and Islamic Law
by Robert Spencer
 
The Supreme Court’s ruling upholding the Second Amendment comes just as it has been revealed that in Iraq, Islamic jihadists have been forcing the Christians remaining in the country to pay jizya -- the tax mandated in the Qur’an for non-Muslims who live under Islamic rule. And in Pakistan’s Northwest Frontier Province, the Taliban has been enforcing Islamic Sharia law by waving automatic weapons, forcing music stores to close down at the point of a gun (music is forbidden in Islamic law). Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Courage - of - our convictions...

"Courage - of - our convictions... is more than just a phrase. It is an ethical challenge to generations of Americans past, present, and future. It is the fuel that burns the beacon of equality and liberty. America has a history of heroes that lived for and died for such courage - to stand as an example to those who would come after them. "



Crossroads in History:
The Struggle against Jihad and Supremacist Ideologies
By Jeffrey Imm

In fighting Islamic supremacism, instead of an approach only based on tactical measures and efforts at clever twists of terminology, what if America had a true strategy that was instead based on the defense of our values on human equality and liberty? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Crippling the nation’s war effort

"Expressions "collaborator with enemy" and “ideological enemy” are not very common in a “politically correct” vocabulary currently used in the United States. Anyone pointing out at "collaborators with enemy" and/or  “ideological enemies” takes a great deal of risk to be accused in “neo-McCarthyism” and all other “deadly” “politically incorrect” sins." - Boris Tiraspolsky
Endorsing values of Islamic jihadists


"The real question that Americans should be asking is WHY it is legal and editorially acceptable... for the Hezbollah and Hamas editorials. This goes back to the fundamental unresolved questions in the minds of a segment of the public as to: (a) is the USA at war or not, (b) if so, who is the enemy, (c) what is our war strategy against the enemy." - Jeffrey Imm
 _________________________________________

 Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Issues of Islamic identity

"The factors that cause militant Islam to decline or flourish appear to have more to do with issues of identity than with economics. Whoever accepts the Islamist (or communist or fascist) worldview, whether rich or poor, young or old, male or female, also accepts the ideological infrastructure that potentially leads to violence, including terrorism."

Marc Sageman, Leaderless Jihad:
Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century
(University of Pennsylvania Press)
____________________________

Which Has More Islamist Terrorism, Europe or America?
 By Daniel Pipes
 
"Since 9/11, there have been over 2,300 arrests connected to Islamist terrorism in Europe in contrast to about 60 in the United States." Thus writes Marc Sageman in his influential new book, Leaderless Jihad: Terror Networks in the Twenty-First Century (University of Pennsylvania Press). Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

We are fiddling while Rome burns

"When is Real Change going to be demanded? When the peasants can no longer afford cable?  When it takes a wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread?  When they're standing in a soup line, hoping to get enough bread to keep their children from starving to death today, trying to remember what a cup of $tarbuck$ tastes like?"


Starbucks closing 600 stores in the US

It's official:
The sky is falling, and we're not doing a darned thing about it.
by Jeff Newcomb (Concepts2),
Member of American Ideological Society
 
The value of our dollar is disappearing faster than a tax dollar at a FEMA barbeque, and we're not doing a single thing to stop it.  That's not entirely true, we're "going back to the well" and lowering interest rates, hoping to reproduce the gold rush mentality that got us in this mess in the first place, which only devalues our currency more. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History of Terror - the Spanish Civil War

"The battlefields of the Spain Civil War provoked Emma Goldman’s mind to a different Strategic Concept of “people’s army”. That was a breakthrough in Strategy of terrorist warfare! Emma Goldman’s new Concept was based on a merge of terrorist Ideology and “invisible” Terrorist Force. Emma Goldman in fact invented a principle of asymmetric warfare. The principle that is still at play." 


International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939)
__________________________________

Terrorist Ideology and "Invisible" Terrorist Force
By Boris Tiraspolsky, Founding Member of
 
Emma Goldman (Read more...) made a major contribution to Strategy of terrorist warfare. She created an organization of International Brigades of Anarchists in America, Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, Germany, France, Spain, and she was in a total control of them. Thus Emma Goldman became the most powerful Woman in the World of that time. 
 
In the 1929 Emma Goldman drew an attention of the most powerful Man in the World - Joseph Stalin. Stalin gave an order to Yakov Bersin, the Head of the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) of that time, to establish a contact with “the most dangerous woman in America”.
  
Relationship between Anarchists and the Soviet Military Intelligence (GRU) is one  of the most secret areas of activities this organization ever had with anyone. Emma Goldman was in the very beginning of this relationship. She established it! Emma Goldman had a dream of creation the Fifth Colon in the United States. Her dream came true with a professional support of the GRU.
 
In 1930 Emma Goldman met in London with the GRU agent “Fred” (Manfred Stern) who was about to be  infiltrated in the United States. The main reason for the meeting was to instruct “Fred” about all the anarchist connections in the United States. Manfred Stern and his spy-partner Vladimir Gorev had to begin an inspection and necessary professional training of American “people’s army” called themselves “Militia“. The “Militia”, according to the Emma Goldman’s Strategic Planning, was an integral part of the Anarchist International Army.
 
Inspection of the American Brigades had begun in 1931 in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Illinois and Kentucky. Manfred Stern and Vladimir Gorev were shocked by an amateur Spirit of the American Brigades. In their reports to the GRU Center they described the Leaders of the “Militia” as the most “incapable and chaotic” people they ever met. 

Some Leaders of American “Militia” openly disagreed with presence of professional military instructors. Most likely, it was a general Anarchist disbelieve in a subordination to the military command. That seemed to become a major reason for a division within the “Militias” of that time. “Patriots” reported a presence of Bolshevik agents in America, and for the first time the Soviet Military Intelligence became a subject for scrutiny and investigation by the FBI. That was one of the major defeats of the GRU.

Josef Stalin and Emma Goldman both but separately had come to a conclusion that the Anarchist International Brigades needed to have a professional training in a real battlefield in order to prepare them for the Grand Battle of coming World Revolution. Spanish Revolution according to Stalin and Goldman strategic plans was just an opportunity for the Anarchist International Brigades to get together, to be initiated by blood, and get ready for the last Battle for the Future of the Mankind. Although Stalin’s planning went much further and called for annihilation of all Anarchists after that.

The Military training of Anarchists was continued secretly in the United States with still devoted to Emma Goldman people. Manfred Stern and Vladimir Gorev appeared in 1936 in Spain as Coordinators of the famous American Abraham Lincoln Brigade. Members of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade became legendary Heroes of Spanish Revolution 1936-1939.

In spite of the complete failure, the Spanish Revolution and the following Civil War became the very first battlefield in the History of Terrorism with the usage of united International Anarchist Force against professionally trained Military Force. The second but successful attempt to use Anarchist Force trained by the GRU was made in Cuba in 1959. It was a “local” adaptation of the Emma Goldman’s original concept. Emma Goldman’s merge of terrorist Ideology and "invisible' Terrorist Force was proven to be still effective!

Emma Goldman was 67 years old when she went to Spain for inspecting the Civil War Theatre and her Anarchist Army. She traveled all over Spain in 1936, and again in 1937, and she visited Spain in 1938. She saw with her own eyes the fruit of her Strategic Planning. Inspection of 1936 was a promising one for Emma Goldman. Inspection of 1937 created many doubts. Inspection of 1938 showed clearly shortcomings of the concept of united International “people’s army” fighting against professional army on a conventional battlefield. 
 
The battlefields of the Spain Civil War provoked Emma Goldman’s mind to a different Strategic Concept of “people’s army”. That was a breakthrough in Strategy of terrorist warfare! Emma Goldman’s new Concept was based on merge of terrorist Ideology and “invisible” Terrorist Force. Emma Goldman in fact invented a principle of asymmetric warfare. The principle that is still at play. 

Strategic Concept of “invisible” Force was originally created and successfully implemented by Emma Goldman’s fellow Russian Anarchists Nestor Machno (1888-1934). The main Strategic Principle of the Machno’s concept was a compensation of a lack of military professionalism with unexpected attack by dynamic and movable independent military cells appeared from “nowhere” as united Force. Nestor Macho was undefeatable! He controlled almost all South-East part of the former Russian Empire until he joined his Anarchist Army with the Bolshevik Red Army! When Nestor Machno’s “invisible” Force became “visible“, and it was totally destroyed by his “allies” Bolsheviks. 

Emma Goldman clearly realized that there was no difference between Fascism and Communism when it comes to live of “free people“. Thus, Emma Goldman had made a crucial discovery in Strategy of terrorist warfare: one does not need to destroy Governments and Capitalist Economics by using just terrorist Force alone. One can destroy Governments and Capitalism in minds of people. Emma Goldman also realized that the terrorist Ideology supported by “invisible” Terrorist Force would make such a Mighty Power that could potentially take over the entire World.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It is your duty

"There's only one ultimate defense against the imposition of tyranny here – armed, self-governing Americans willing and able to resist it."



Celebrate Heller, buy guns
by Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah
 
I've said it before and I'll say it again. No court is going to preserve your God-given right to bear arms and defend yourself and your family from criminals, terrorists and tyrannical government. It's up to you to preserve that right – by exercising it. Rights are like muscles. You don't use 'em, you lose 'em. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian war preparations

“According Soviet military plans,” said Lunev, “very well in advance, maybe few months, maybe few weeks … before real war … Russian Special Operations Forces [will] come here to pick up weapons systems, because they will fly here as tourists, businessmen.” Once inside the United States they would locate prepositioned weapons of mass destruction. According to Lunev, “They need to come here with clean hands, only with doc-uments. Maybe some money, that is all. But according to their tasking, in a few hours they need to physically destroy [and] eliminate American military chains of command, President, Supreme Commander-in-Chief, Vice President, Speaker of the House, military commanders, especially to cut [the] head from American military chain of command. They need to destroy communications system in this country and grow panic and chaos in this country before real war would be in place.”


The Enemy’s Scheme of Attack
by J. R. Nyquist

A small war can grow into a great war. Superpowers may confront each other. In fact, it’s happening now. The world’s superpowers are suppressing Islamists in Iraq and Chechnya. Adjoining each conflict is another conflict, ready to flare up. On May 6 the Russian press declared: Russia-Georgia ‘close to war’, Tbilisi to blame – Russian NATO envoy. At the same time, Russia has warned the U.S. against preemptively striking Iran. The Americans are presented with a dilemma. If the U.S. doesn’t strike Iran before the November presidential election then Israel will launch a strike. Either way, the Middle East comes unhinged within seven months. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The growing Islamist 5th column in America

"Rasool, an Afghan immigrant... took an oath to protect this country several years ago when he joined the FCPD, which is the largest force in Virginia and a key partner with the FBI in investigating major terror cases in the Washington area, including the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon."



CAIR's Traitorous Cop Ally
 
By Paul Sperry

If the Taliban catches an American spy, they slit the informer's throat. If we catch a pro-Taliban spy, he gets a slap on the wrist after getting a letter from a Muslim pressure group urging leniency. Who says we're winning this war? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spoiled Children of Freedom of Speech

Practical advise:
If your child is already spoiled and already showing signs of disrespect and bad behavior, one of the best ways to cure him would be ignoring him.
_______________________________________


The Liberty Bell, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is an American bell of great historic and ideological significance. It is perhaps one of the most prominent symbols associated with the American Revolution and the American Revolutionary War. It is one of the most familiar symbols of independence, abolition of slavery, nationhood and freedom within the United States, and has been described as an international icon of Liberty.
_______________________________________

Taking for granted the Blessings of Liberty

American politicians are spoiled children of Freedom of Speech, taking the precious gift of free oral and written expression for granted. 

They know that any of their spoken and written words are totally protected with so-called “constitutional rights“, and therefore, they say and write anything they can in order to get everything they want.

Consequently, there is a commonly accepted lack of responsibility for words, both spoken and written among American politicial elites.Like all spoiled children, American politicians presume an absolute value of often irrelevant and sometimes totally wrong opinions they expressed themselves.

No wander, they can hardly hear voices of independent thinkers representing thoughts being contrary to what most of the American politicians trivially say, or write. 

American politicians are accustomed to utilize Freedom of Speech, which is a fundamental condition for maintaining a healthy society and public good, as an Instrument for achievement of personal goals, and advancing own political agenda. 

That is objectively called an abuse of Freedom of Speech.

Let’s be clear about that! 

Abuse of Freedom of Speech is an alarming indication of a lack of Ethics - high standards of human conduct, or morals, and ongoing degrading of Esthetics - uncertainty in perception of true beauty and ugliness in minds of people. 

There is a widely spread notion among the American people that Freedom of Speech will be staying forever as a sort of metaphysical Principle naturally integrated in the American way of life, no matter what. 

However, Freedom of Speech lacking high standards of morals ends up with a total disrespect of Principles, and insult of others intelligence. 

Freedom of Speech ignoring Esthetics turns into an incoherent mumbling incapable of delivering an articulate message.

Freedom of Speech is one of the first Blessings of Liberty secured by the Constitution of the United States.

That is why the People of the United States are obligated to maintain high standards of Ethics and Esthetics of the Society to fulfill the order of the Constitution of the United States:


Contributed by Ben Imas and Boris Tiraspolsky
American Ideological Society  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It’s good to be the king

"Mr. Putin likes the way the population treats him. Despite all their problems and hardships, the majority of people like him, no matter what he does. They believe in the Great Russia slogan the Tsar’s team has offered for their consumption, though the centuries have so tired them that they don’t seem to understand that they will never see it if current trends continue. "

 
Ideological Enemy of the Nation - PM Vladimir Putin

Putin's Russia: Freedom of Fear 
By Dmitry Sidorov
 
Mel Brooks was right: It’s good to be the king. And it’s even better if you rule a country full of metals, diamonds, oil, and gas. But the size of the country matters as well as its history. The first tells you how much is up for grabs. The second suggests a strategy to keep the population calm and controlled. On both counts, Vladimir Putin has every reason to be a very happy man. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History of Terror - Emma Goldman

"No sacrifice is lost for a great ideal!"


Emma Goldman (1869-1940)
_________________________________

Ideologist of anti-state Terrorism and radical Feminism

Super powerful Woman of her time,  Emma Goldman was an anarchist known for her political activism, writing, and speeches. She was lionized as a free-thinking "rebel woman" by admirers, and derided as an advocate of politically motivated murder and violent revolution by her critics. She played a pivotal role in the development of anarchist political philosophy in the United States and Europe in the first half of the twentieth century. She developed new ways of incorporating gender politics into anarchism.
__________________________________
 
Continued...

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Strategic thoughts about the U.S. War on Terror

"The U.S. War on Terror in which the current combating Islamic jihadists is just one of many operational fragments has no time limits, no precise topography and requires anti-terrorist operations that form unlimited number of battlefields on three major anti-terrorist Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological."



Three Theatres of Anti-Terrorist War
by Boris Tiraspolsky,
Founding Member of 
Modern terrorist warfare is in essence undeclared total war for exhaustion enemy’s human and economic resources. It is de facto rapidly escalating global confrontation between diverse and relatively small groups of terrorist-aggressors, their sponsors, and very loosely organized anti-terrorist resistance formed out of different States either directly attacked by terrorists and/or anticipating terrorist attacks in the future. In other words, modern terrorist warfare is in fact unconventional total siege warfare (Read more...).
  

In this type of war all involved sides are using “totality of maneuvers” of conventional and unconventional Instruments and Forces with an intent as much as possible to reduce enemy’s military power, decrease enemy’s economic capacity and diminish enemy’s ideological strength with a strategic objective to brake enemy’s will to resist.

The U.S. War on Terror in which the current combating Islamic jihadists is just one of many operational fragments has no time limits, no precise topography and requires anti-terrorist operations that form unlimited number of battlefields on three major anti-terrorist Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological.

In contrast to the World War I and World War II, where each Theatre of War was relatively independent, Military, Economic and Ideological theatres of modern terrorist warfare characterize hierarchal dependency on each other. Therefore, it is absolutely vital that all three anti-terrorist Theatres will become integral parts of “useful” Operational Art and function simultaneously as ONE BATTLE WITH TERROR unifying efforts of both the U.S. Government and the U.S. population.

It is impossible to deny that the Military Theatre of anti-terrorist operations logically including Law Enforcement and Intelligence, totally depends on engaging operations of anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Theatres. On the contrary to terrorist economic Instruments of Terror (Read More...), Economic Theatre is operating with anti-terrorist Economic Instruments and Economic Forces (Read more...). The latter are fully responsible for anti-terrorist economic mobilization of the Nation.

Ideological Theatre of anti-terrorist war forms the top of the mentioned above hierarchy. Both, Military and Economic Theatres entirely counts on Ideological Theatre responsible for anti-terrorist ideological mobilization of the Nation. Its realization wholly relies on a presence in battle superior defensive and offensive ant-terrorist Ideological Instruments and anti-terrorist Ideological Forces necessary to withstand ideological Instruments of Terror (Read more...) and sustain the will of the Nation to resist.
     
In other words, when the U.S. Military - arguably the best military on the planet - performs successful anti-terrorist operation - this is a direct result of a right coordination and mutual effort of all three Theatres of War: Military, Economic and Ideological. On the conrary, any U.S. Military defeat needs to be looked at first in weaknesses of defensive and offensive U.S. anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Instruments and Forces. The very Instruments and Forces the Nation still does not have available in battle with Terror.  
 
When it comes to U.S. anti-terrorist Ideological Instruments, let me reiterate what I said many times: it is unrealistic to successfully conduct ideologically charged battle with Terror without an inclusive U.S. anti-terrorist Ideological Education on all levels and mighty U.S. anti-terrorist Public Relations, or rather anti-terrorist Propaganda Machine combining mass media, press, book publishing, Internet, and etc. It is not viable, whatsoever, to win “ideological struggle” without ideologically charged arts, including “useful” Performing Arts (Read more...) - drama, opera, ballet, music, motion pictures, TV shows, radio shows, and other basic Ideological Instruments.
 
Therefore, it is reasonable to conclude: due to the mentioned above specifics of modern terrorist warfare, and without available superior defensive and offensive anti-terrorist Economic and Ideological Instruments and Forces, forming along with the Military Theatre also Economic and Ideological Theatres of anti-terrorist war, the War on Terror cannot and will not be won by using just U.S. Military might alone. It is true, regardless of how powerful and superior U.S. Military Instruments and Forces could be.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive