About Me

Name:Boris Tiraspolsky
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The ideology behind Jihadist terrorism

"...despite that terrible human tragedy and the thousands of pages of doc-uments, indictments, reports, and studies on the 1998 embassy bombings, we still have many today who refuse to confront the ideology behind Jihadist terrorism."



1998 U.S. Embassy Bombings and Denial on Jihad's Ideology
By Jeffrey Imm

Ten years ago, on August 7, 1998, Al-Qaeda conducted simultaneous car bombings of U.S. embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Over 250 died in these attacks, including 10 Americans at the U.S. embassy in Nairobi, and 6000 were reported injured. The August 7, 2008 East African Standard reports that new intelligence reports show that the Al-Qaeda terrorists planned in Nairobi "to use a device twice as big as the one that exploded." The Kenyan Daily Nation reported that 300 of the injured subsequently died. The majority of the victims of the embassy bombings were African civilians. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democracy and anti-terrorist warfare

"Just those deserve both Liberty and Life,
Who're ready every day to fight for them and die." 
-
Johan Wolfgang Goethe


Militades (c.555-489)
 
Militades belonged to the old nobility, but he was loyal to Hippias' regime. In 520 he was sent to to the Hellespontine region, where he ruled as a tyrant in a small kingdom of his own. However, in 514, when his ally Hippias had been expelled, he switched his loyalty to the Persian king Darius I the Great, who conquered the region on his way to Thrace and Scythia. When the Greeks in the Persian empire unsuccessfully revolted, his position became untenable, and he returned to Athens, where he became one of the war leaders when the Persians wanted to reinstate Hippias in Athens. At Marathon, Miltiades defeated the Persians and secured the continued existence of Athens as an independent power and a democracy.
 _____________________

Debate in ongoing battle with Terror

There is no doubt that free democratic debate is a vital and integral part of any civil society with established Democratic Institutions. Debate in America, for instance, is a manifestation of “freedom of speech“ sacredly honored by the First Amendments to the Constitution of the Unites States - the Supreme Law of the Land. 
 
However, “democratic debate” and “life or death” battle against aggressor are not compatible by a given. Moreover, when “democratic debate” takes over, victory is in jeopardy. The most known realization of this simple and universal truth happened about 2500 thousand years ago in ancient Greece at a time of Battle of Marathon 490 BC. 

At that time Attica and central Greece were in great danger of attack by Persians. According to Herodotus, “there was a delay of some days before the battle actually began“. Ten Athenian generals passionately debated whether the battle should be joined at all. Many generals were opposed the battle.

It had become self-evident for Miltiades that the endless “democratic debate” all the generals were ardently involved in became a danger for the existence of Athens. The paradox was that the “democratic debate” turned into an obstacle for a survival of a democracy facing invasion of totally foreign to democracy aggressor. 

Militades finally “titled the balance in favor of battle“. Most importantly, he managed to convince all other generals to submit their military units under a command of the single Commander-in-Chief. 

There will be no mistake to say that the victory in most famous in history Battle of Marathon was actually achieved by two totally “anti-democratic” measures. First one was dumping “democratic debate” at a time of a danger for democracy. Second one was imposing on a majority of free citizenry orders of ONE Commander. 

Among many revelations coming with a slow pace unfolding modern terrorist warfare is that the War declared against the Nation by Islamic jihadists and “democratic debate” occurred in a middle of ongoing battle under no circ-umstances can coexist, either. Otherwise “democratic debate” turns into moral paralysis of the Nation and ugly ideological collaboration with aggressor. (Read more...)
 
“Democracy” in America is currently consumed by predominant majority of the American people as all sorts of “people’s rights”, unalienable and granted by the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. In contrast, total War waged by Islamic jihadists against the Nation calls for an unprecedented responsibility of the People of the United States to “preserve, protect and defend” spiritual, cultural, and material values, including the Constitution of the United States itself. 
 
For the first time in the History of the Nation the Constitution of the United States is under direct ideological attack by the aggressor intended to establish the Islamic Law, as the Supreme Law of the Land. Therefore, there is nothing to “debate” at a time of Battle with Terror! The free and sovereign Nation must follow the original order of the Constitution to “secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”, or it will perish, otherwise.
  
The Constitutional Responsibility of the People to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” ought to irreversibly replace any and all “democratic debates” at a time of global battle with Terror. It is the first and right step in forming U.S. Ideology of Anti-Terrorism “being necessary for a security of free State”, regardless of where battle with Terror occurs - on the American soil, or on battlefields far abroad.

Boris Tiraspolsky
Founding Member of
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

If we forget about God

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. Corrupt are they, and have done abominable iniquity: there is none that doeth good. (Psalm 53:1)


Alexander Solzhenitsyn
__________________________

God and Solzhenitsyn
by

 
When Alexander Solzhenitsyn died last weekend, I was reminded how this brilliant man of letters explained so simply and accurately how it was that 60 million perished following the Bolshevik revolution in his country. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History of Terror - August 6, 1945 Hiroshima

"The atom bomb was no "great decision." It was merely another powerful weapon in the arsenal of righteousness." - Harry S. Truman, President of the United States


The A-Bomb dome memorial viewed from the Peace Park in Hiroshima, Japan.
________________________________

August 6, 1945: US drops atomic bomb on Hiroshima
 
The first atomic bomb has been dropped by a United States aircraft on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. President Harry S Truman, announcing the news from the cruiser, USS Augusta, in the mid-Atlantic, said the device was more than 2,000 times more powerful than the largest bomb used to date. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. ideological model in battle with Terror

"The war of ideas is supposed to be one of three equal components of the U.S.-led war on terrorism, after military operations and law enforcement and intelligence counterterrorism. However, it is by far the least developed aspect, according to U.S. officials."




War of ideas

By Bill Gertz

James K. Glassman, the new undersecretary of state for public diplomacy, has launched a more aggressive program to counter Islamist extremism through a war of ideas. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Refusing to identify the enemy's ideology

"In addition to refusing to identify the enemy's ideology, some have also been waging a disinformation campaign that there isn't any meaningful connection between Jihad and an enemy ideology. Non-interventionist Marc Sageman makes this argument claiming that Jihadists are just "thrill" seekers. National Security Advisor Steven Hadley, urging patience with Pakistan, has called for more education in Pakistan and has launched schools in Pakistan areas, ironically, where Jihadist activity has since increased."



Pakistan and Delusions about Negotiating on Jihad
By Jeffrey Imm

Would America find it a shocking news revelation if a white supremacist organization had members supporting Ku Klux Klan terrorism? Would the FBI go to white supremacist political groups to fight the Ku Klux Klan, or seek white supremacist leaders to convince KKK members to change their thinking? But when it comes to the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, the Taliban, and Jihadist organizations around the world, this type of nonsensical thinking has become a common argument among many international relations circles, including American government leadership, because nearly 8 years after 9/11, such leadership continues to refuse to clearly define the enemy threat and ideology. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History of Terror - the JFK Assassination


"It is well known that Stalin and Khrushchev both dispatched assassins to the West. In the late 1930s Stalin called for the head of his former colleague, Leon Trotsky. As history records, Ramón Mercader fatally stabbed Trotsky with an ice pick in Mexico. Not only did Stalin reward the assassin’s mother with the Order of Lenin; but in 1961 Khrushchev rewarded Mercader with the highest decoration the Kremlin could offer, Hero of the Soviet U-nion." 

Politics by Assasination?
by J. R. Nyquist

Did the Kremlin order a hit on President John F. Kennedy in 1962? The former chief of Communist Romania’s foreign intelligence service thinks so. And he lays out his case in a recently published book with the title Programmed to Kill: Lee Harvey Oswald, the Soviet KGB, and the Kennedy Assassination.  According to Ion Mihai Pacepa, “all Soviet-bloc espionage services were identically organized and had an identical modus operandi.” Pacepa also explained that, “Soviet espionage operations … can easily be identified by their particular patterns, of you are familiar with them.” Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Year Later: Are Bridges Any Safer?

"One year after a bridge collapse in Minneapolis killed 13 people, bridge inspections across the country are still fundamentally flawed and inundated with error, according to industry experts and recent studies." - ABC News
 
"Bureaucracy is the death of all sound work." - Albert Einstein



 Time to rethink the role of U.S. Bureaucracies in life of the Nation
By Boris Tiraspolsky, Founding Member of
American Ideological Society
 
The recent explosion of a steam pipe in New York City and collapse of the bridge in Minneapolis are clear warning signs of the aged and in many parts obsolete National infrastructure.

The bridge in Minneapolis was deemed "structurally deficient" in 1990 in part because of some corroded bearings, but it was not expected to be replaced until 2020.

Dan Dorgan, a state bridge engineer for the Minnesota Department of Transportation, said a "deficient" designation did not mean a bridge needed to be immediately replaced. 77,000 bridges across the country, he said, have a similar designation.

Still, Dorgan said: "We thought we had done all we could. Obviously something went terribly wrong." That is so true! - something did go terribly wrong, and I know precisely what!

A 2003 report from the American Society of Civil Engineers called 27 percent of American bridges “structurally deficient" or functionally obsolete. Three years later(!) a 2006 Federal Highway Administration study placed the label "structurally deficient" on nearly 74,000 bridges across the country, or 12.3 percent. 

12.3 percent  or 27 percent? This is a great difference! How many “structurally deficient" or functionally obsolete bridges are in America, after all? 74,000? 77,000? 170,000? Or may be even more? No one  seems really  to know.

The road infrastructure historically is not a part of the private sector of the National Economy. The full responsibility for solving problem with bridges is on the shoulders of the so called "public sector" that is entirely in hands of local, state, and Federal bureaucrats.

Well... 100,000 bridges more, 100,0000 bridges fewer. There is no a big difference for bureaucrats from Federal Highway Administration. Needless to say, that the “structural deficiency" was a life or death matter for all those who were crossing the collapsed bridge in Minneapolis. 
 
The deteriorating National road infrastructure must be taken very seriously. However, the scale of necessary works that ought to be done and financial burden required to fix the problem greatly exceed a realistic ability of the U.S. Bureaucracies to handle it. In other words, one can see another example of a total incompetence of the U.S. Bureaucracies in matters of National emergency. 

There is no currently a sound National Project that can coordinate this grand endeavor of fixing bridges. Moreover, there is no a sufficient trained Labor Force that can accomplish a task of this magnitude within an observing time frame. Besides, I have a reasonable doubt that bureaucrats can ever come up with something that could work.

This is with no doubt a big national problem, but this is the problem of just bridges in America. Now, imagine the United States are attacked by terrorists with Weapons of Mass Destruction, and all the emergency services are provided by the same bureaucrats that cannot take care even of the U.S. bridges. God forbid! 

This is the time to fundamentally rethink the role of U.S. Bureaucracies in life if the American people. And the soonner, the better. The Nation needs new creative Instruments and Forces to meet unprecedented challenges of future National emergencies. This is the time to rethink the role of U.S. Bureaucracies in life of the Nation and learn Why U.S. need All-National Civilian Self-Defense.  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Could it happen to you?

"Only a well-armed citizenry is an effective countermeasure to deter crime and other threats on our life and liberty. There's no substitute. None. Zip. Zilch. Nada." -  Joseph Farah



The duty of armed self-defense
by Ideological Warrior of the Nation - Joseph Farah
 
What are the chances you will ever be attacked by armed assailants in a situation in which no one else can help you and your only chance for survival rests in using your own loaded firearm? Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government-imposed political correctness

"Congressman Peter Hoekstra from Michigan has recently introduced legislation that would ban the banning by the Government of the use of various terms describing Islamic jihadists who want to wage holy war against us. The Administration has decided using such terms by Government officials somehow “rewards” jihadists and offends regular, moderate Muslims."
  Righteous effort by Congressman Hoekstra
 


The War on Words
  
By Deborah Weiss
 
During the past year, several federal agencies – including the Department of Homeland Security, the State Department, and the National Counter Terrorism Center – have declared a war on words. Specifically, these agencies have issued memoranda discouraging their employees from naming the enemy in the War on Terror. The prohibition included words such as “jihad,” “Islamist,” “Islamofascism,” and “caliphate,” among others. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Easier said then done

Secretary Michael Chertoff said: There are basically five major bands in which I'll kind of analyze our work: There is keeping bad people out of the country, keeping bad stuff out of the country, protecting the infrastructure, building a capable response agency, and integrating the department. Continued...


Secretary Michael Chertoff 
_______________________________________________
 
Secretary Michael Chertoff said: "European terrorists trying to enter US. The terrorists are deliberately focusing on people who have legitimate Western European passports, who don't appear to have records as terrorists. I have a good degree of confidence we can catch people coming in. But I have to tell you ... there's no guarantee. And they are working very hard to slip by us. My concern that terrorists could sneak radiological material into the country on small boats or private aircraft. This material could be used to create an explosive device known as a "dirty bomb."

Comment by Boris Tiraspolsky:

Secretary Michael Chertoff is notorious for his remarks, comments and 'gut feeling' related to terrorist attacks on the American soil. Here is another one. 

Secretary Michael Chertoff said that he has "a good degree of confidence we can catch" those "who don't appear to have records as terrorists". 

At first, this  sounded like a not funny joke to me. 
 
Later I started to worry. I am not a terrorist, and naturally I do not appear to have a record as a terrorist either. 
 
So, the statement by Secretary Michael Chertoff  really puzzles me.

How in a world the U.S. Department of Homeland Security will be able to distinguish people like me from  those who are terrorists, but "who don't appear to have records as terrorists"?

By the way, illegal immigrants also "don't appear to have records as terrorists" either, but they continue  crossing the U.S.-Mexican Border every day. Does anyone really know how many illegal immigrants manage to cross the U.S.-Canadian Border?
 
I am confident that some of those illegal immigrants may have a record as terrorists. 

Does  Secretary Michael Chertoff have "a good degree of confidence we can catch" those people? Why don't the U.S. Department of Homeland Security catch them, then? Easier said then done?  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Distinction between religion and terrorism

"At first one should welcome any statement [by Islamic theologists] that delegitimizes al Qaeda's hot-headed Jihadism, even if the fatwa doesn't cross the doctrinal line. Any call to stop terrorism is positive and should be built upon."



The Deobandi Fatwa Against Terrorism Didn't Treat the Jihadi Root
By Walid Phares

Many in the West and in other regions of the world were impressed by the issuing of a fatwa (Islamic theological edict) condemning Terrorism by one of the leading religious centers in the Muslim world, the Darool-Uloom Deoband in India. An Islamic seminary said to have 'inspired' the Taliban has, according to the said doc-ument denounced "terrorism" as against Islam, calling it an "unpardonable sin." Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The problem is ignorance

The educational system must emphasize that Islam is a religion like others and jihadists are an ideological movement. Let’s not confuse the two. I don’t think it’s a question of tolerance - the problem is ignorance."



Europe, Islam and Jihadism: establishing the distinctions
By Walid Phares

In my last European professional tour of June-July, I briefed and lectured Government officials, NGOs and European U-nion audiences in Rome, Berlin, Brussels, Paris and London. I will report on the main issues of discussions and areas of common interest in the near future. One of the hot issues of exchange has been the ability for Europeans (Government and public) to make a distrinction between the theology of Islam and the ideology of Jihadism. Although links have been established by the Jihadists themselves, especially in their indoctrination process, EU and local Government officials need to isolate the doctrinal political component from the theological web, for the prupose of drawing national security strategies. But the Jihadi lobby has been efficient in blurring the frontiers in the purpose of keeping authorities and the public at bay. This trend is now developing in the United States as well, particularly since the dissemination of the so-called "lexicon." The battle of ideas seems to be now taking place within the West, between two camps: those who want to isolate the ideology of Jihadism as a root of Terrorism and those who wish to camouflage it for a variety of reasons. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The largest international law enforcement presence

"Because of the international scope of drug trafficking, the DEA has the largest international law enforcement presence of any U.S. agency (87 foreign offices in 63 countries) and these offices are staffed by agents who are operationally active with their international partners."



DEA as Counter-Terror Agency

 by Aaron Mannes

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) has, quietly, become a very effective counter-terror agency. The arrest of international arms dealers Victor Bout and Monzar al-Kasser (in operations worthy of movie scripts) were only one example. The agency had at least a peripheral role in the Betancourt rescue – a DEA operation inserted bugged satellite phones into the FARC, a crucial tactic that has made a tremendous contribution to the FARC’s overall breakdown. In general the agency seems to have adapted well overall to the counter-terror mission, among other things doing a competent job at building up its analytical capabilities. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Righteous effort by Congressman Hoekstra

"The Administration may claim what it has put out is a mere guideline and does not preclude Government officials from using such terms [“jihad,” “mujahadine,” “caliphate”. and etc.] when “necessary.” Perhaps. Within the Government bureaucracy, unfortunately, such policies often take on a life of their own and grow far beyond the original intent. What Congressman Hoekstra is doing is a righteous effort to kill a weed at its root."


Congressman Peter Hoekstra
_________________________

Words, Sticks and Stones
By Bill West

Congressman Peter Hoekstra from Michigan has recently introduced legislation that would ban the banning by the Government of the use of various terms describing Islamic jihadists who want to wage holy war against us. The Administration has decided using such terms by Government officials somehow “rewards” jihadists and offends regular, moderate Muslims. This topic has been covered by the CTB fairly extensively. Continued...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive